Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

About

About BackBone: TODO

Volume 1, Issue 1, 2018

BackBone

Articles

Anesthesia Pitfalls and Considerations for Spine Surgery

Surgery on the spine and spinal cord involves a wide variety of surgical procedures whose pathologies depend on the age of the patient.  For children and teenagers the most common reason to need spine surgery is to either correct spinal deformities or oncologic disease.  The pathologies that adult spine patients typically present with are trauma, infection, malignancy causing neurologic compromise, idiopathic spinal deformity, and degenerative disease.  This can lead to a wide range of spinal surgeries including minimally invasive decompression procedures to major deformity correction involving osteotomies and major blood loss. These adult patients have a unique set of anesthetic challenges and the goal should be to provide an individualized anesthetic plan to optimize outcomes.

Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion with the C-VBR

Abstract

Introduction:  Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF) procedures are increasing as the population ages and cancer treatments improve.  Currently, one expandable and one non-expandable cervical Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR) devices have been FDA 510(k) approved.  Cervical VBR device specific data has yet to be established.

 

Object:  To present the efficacy and safety data of the first non-expandable cervical VBR device to receive FDA 510(k) approval.

 

Methods: A retrospective consecutive series of 56 female and 41 male ACCF patients, from a single institution, were followed for an average of 30 months.   ACCF patients were, on average, taking 11 different daily medications, 40 (41%) were smokers and 39 (40%) were on anticoagulation therapy that required pre- and post-operation management. Eighty-nine percent were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III or IV.  Sixty-six patients had pre-operative C2-7 Cobb angles of five degrees or less.  Fusion was determined by CT scan, flexion/extension X-rays or both.  Complications of dysphagia, subsidence, non-union and additional surgery were recorded.  Demographic pre-operative patient characteristics and post-operative fusion rates were presented with descriptive statistics.  Complication rates were tabulated during the follow-up period.

 

Results:  Fusion was documented in 89 of 93 patients (96%).  To be statistically conservative, the three patients with inadequate radiographic follow-up were counted as non-unions.  Twenty-three patients (25%) had additional surgery during the follow-up period, 5 (5%) planned, 18 (19%) unplanned.

 

Conclusion:  The fusion rate was 96% and consistent with previous ACCF reports.  Three cases of C-VBR subsidence resulted in dysphagia and subsequent anterior plate removal.  Incidentally, the ACCF rate was noted to be higher than the ACDF rate in this cohort of patients at high risk for surgical morbidity and mortality.  The C-VBR was found to be a safe and effective device for ACCF surgery.

  • 1 supplemental file

Narrative Review: Disc Herniation After Motor Vehicular Trauma

Spinal pain that arises from motor vehicular trauma is challenging to the treating physician due to the wide spectrum of presenting symptoms and responses to treatment, including traumatic disc herniations.  The severity of injuries varies from patient to patient, with imaging often not strictly correlating to symptomatology.  However, with a systematic approach, including an understanding of the limitations of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the role of cytokines and inflammatory mediators, the treatment and diagnosis from patients suffering from traumatic disc herniations can be improved1,2.  Furthermore, evidence supports conservative management before escalation to more invasive procedures such as epidurals or surgery, specifically in uncomplicated spinal injury patients with no evidence of neural compromise warranting emergency surgery3,4.   Should surgery be needed, mounting evidence supports intervention with minimally invasive discectomy for lumbar herniations and cervical disc arthroplasty for cervical herniations5–8.